|
|

Hand-Arm Vibration Syndrome
A guide to the problem of Hand-Arm Vibration (White Finger)
HAVS - The Problem
- Hand-Arm Vibration Syndrome (HAVS) is a widespread industrial disease affecting
tens of thousands of workers. Its best known effect is vibration-induced white finger
(VWF)
- Attacks are painful and can result in the loss of ability to grip properly
(severe cases can lead to gangrene)
- Any vibrating tool or process which causes tingling or numbness after 5 to
10 minutes of continuous use is suspect
- Where people regularly use such equipment for prolonged periods there is likely
to be a risk of injury
- Construction workers are often exposed to high-risk machines like Plate Compactors,
Petrol Saws, Breakers, and other common power tools.
| What is hand-arm vibration? |
|
Hand-arm vibration syndrome (HAVS) is a widespread industrial disease affecting
hundreds of thousands of workers. It is caused by regular exposure to vibration,
especially from vibrating hand tools, and is therefore a particular problem
for the construction industry. |
| |
|
|
| Exposure to hand-arm vibration can cause: |
|
damage to the blood vessels, reducing the blood supply damage to nerves, causing
a permanent loss of feeling damage to bones and muscles, similar to arthritis
Symptoms include: tingling and numbness loss of sensation and manual dexterity
finger blanching and chilblains, aching digits and limbs. Its best-known effect
is vibration white finger (VWF), where the fingers turn white during an attack,
but it is the loss of manual dexterity and grip strength which are the most debilitating
symptoms. |
| |
|
|
| Measuring hand-arm vibration |
|
Hand-arm vibration is notoriously difficult to measure. The main pitfalls are
associated with the necessity to attach the transducers directly to the plant
or component, and the main factor affecting the accuracy of an assessment
is the skill and experience applied to the measurements. Full assessments
including both measurements and dose calculations should only be carried out
by a 'competent person'. Most importantly, vibration measurements should not
be carried out using hand-held accelerometers, unless there is absolutely
no alternative.
The assessment procedure (to BS 6842:1987) involves:
- carrying out 3-axis (on two or three handles for many tools) frequency
weighted measurements on each tool handle during typical 'real' tool use
- an accurate assessment of "finger on trigger" time calculation
of the vibration dose for each handle and operation
A database of accurate field vibration measurements is available for many hand
tools, which can be used as part of a risk assessment. |
| |
|
|
| (Extract from Construction News 19/04/2001) |
| General legislation including the Health and Safety at Work Act
1992 and the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1992 require
that: |
|
EMPLOYERS NEED TO CONTROL THE RISK OF HAVS |
HAVS - The Solution
- Include Hand-Arm Vibration in your Health and Safety policy:
- Train operatives
- Monitor and limit exposure
- Select low vibration equipment
- Check that the vibration levels and useage times quoted by the manufacturer
are accurate and represent real life working conditions.
- Ensure the machine’s productivity (output) is high. Inefficient
equipment, even with low vibration, can expose operators to harmful levels because
they have to use it for longer to finish the job.
- Choose tools that are easy and comfortable for operators to use. Less effort
equals less vibration.
| Belle Group equipment is built for low vibration |
|
Tested under realistic working conditions |
|
Designed for maximum performance and output |
|
Comfortable to use with excellent ergonomics |
HAVS - The Proof
Comparative tests were carried out by AV Technology (Stockport) Ltd April 2001.
The information gathered was to be used in a publication "Plant Hire Executive"
to demonstrate the difference in the data supplied by manufacturers and the actual levels
produced under working conditions.
Tests were carried out on 100mm deep MOT material (crushed aggregate with fines).
Summarised below are the average levels of the 6 passes for each compactor.
|
| Average ah,w |
|
Time Limit |
|
| Belle PC 400 |
|
3.88m/s² |
|
4h 10min |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Wacker WP1540A |
|
8.97m/s² |
|
47min |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Bomag BP 10/36-2 |
|
12.15m/s² |
|
25min |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Benford BPC 1535 |
|
9.24m/s² |
|
44min |
| |
|
|
|
|
Belle PC 400 (second set to establish repeatability)
|
|
3.69m/s² |
|
4h 36min |
|
The instrumentation used to perform the measurements was a Svan 912AE
Sound and Vibration Analyser, Svan 06A 4 channel module and Svan AP5021 Hand-Arm Adapter
Set. Before leaving AVT's offices the instrumentation was calibrated using a Bruel
& Kjaer Type 4291 Calibrator which itself is traceably calibrated to UKAS (formally
NAMAS) Standards.
The analyser was set-up to measure weighted acceleration magnitudes
in all three axes simultaneously.The tri-axial accelerometer was fitted to the handle
of each compactor at the position where the operator normally holds the hand by means
of a jubilee clip. The weighting curve used corresponds with the hand-arm vibration
weighting curve in BS 6842:1987. Handarm vibration was measured in 3 axes simultaneously
through several work cycles of approximately 22 seconds each and the total weighted
rms acceleration was determined from the vector sum of the three weighted rms acceleration
values ('ax,w' side to side, 'ay,w' fore
and aft, and 'az,w' vertical).
Each compactor was tested running over a 'MOT' type material. The ground
was 'raked' by means of an adaptor fitted on to the front of a skid steer loader after
each machine to provide an identical work surface for all compactors. A total of 6
passes were undertaken on the same section of track on each compactor.
Belle Group plate compactors are designed
to give the lowest hand-arm vibration and the maximum
performance AS STANDARD
Dual Force is available on all PC Plates to upgrade the compaction force -
full compaction is achieved with fewer passes so the operator is exposed to
less vibration |
|
Belle Group AFS Floor Saws have been developed
to give the lowest hand-arm vibration and the maximum
performance
The use of hand held saws for floor sawing is an extremely high risk
operation even for small patches. The AFS300 is the perfect alternative,
the 350 gives a deeper cut and higher output. |
|
Belle Group UD Breakers have been developed
to give the lowest hand-arm vibration and the maximum
performance
Breakers are often used for extended periods so operators are at high
risk. The unique design of the UD breaker maximises operator control
and vibration reduction. |
|
|