|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Skype users can call us by clicking the link below
 |
|

Hand-Arm Vibration Syndrome
A guide to the problem of Hand-Arm Vibration
(White Finger)
HAVS - The Problem
- Hand-Arm Vibration Syndrome (HAVS)
is a widespread industrial disease affecting tens of thousands of
workers. Its best known effect is vibration-induced white finger (VWF)
- Attacks are painful and can result
in the loss of ability to grip properly (severe cases can lead to
gangrene)
- Any vibrating tool or process
which causes tingling or numbness after 5 to 10 minutes of continuous
use is suspect
- Where people regularly use such
equipment for prolonged periods there is likely to be a risk of injury
- Construction workers are often exposed to
high-risk machines like Plate Compactors, Petrol Saws, Breakers, and
other common power tools.
|
What is hand-arm vibration?
|
|
Hand-arm vibration syndrome (HAVS) is a
widespread industrial disease affecting hundreds of thousands of workers.
It is caused by regular exposure to vibration, especially from vibrating
hand tools, and is therefore a particular problem for the construction
industry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exposure to hand-arm vibration can cause:
|
|
damage to the blood vessels, reducing the blood supply damage
to nerves, causing a permanent loss of feeling damage to bones and muscles,
similar to arthritis Symptoms include: tingling and numbness loss of
sensation and manual dexterity finger blanching and chilblains, aching
digits and limbs. Its best-known effect is vibration white finger (VWF),
where the fingers turn white during an attack, but it is the loss of manual
dexterity and grip strength which are the most debilitating symptoms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measuring hand-arm vibration
|
|
Hand-arm vibration is notoriously difficult to
measure. The main pitfalls are associated with the necessity to attach the
transducers directly to the plant or component, and the main factor
affecting the accuracy of an assessment is the skill and experience applied
to the measurements. Full assessments including both measurements and dose
calculations should only be carried out by a 'competent person'. Most
importantly, vibration measurements should not be carried out using
hand-held accelerometers, unless there is absolutely no alternative.
The assessment procedure (to BS 6842:1987)
involves:
- carrying out 3-axis (on
two or three handles for many tools) frequency weighted measurements
on each tool handle during typical 'real' tool use
- an accurate assessment of
"finger on trigger" time calculation of the vibration dose
for each handle and operation
A database of accurate field vibration
measurements is available for many hand tools, which can be used as part of
a risk assessment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Extract from Construction News 19/04/2001)
|
|
General legislation including the Health and Safety at Work
Act 1992 and the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1992
require that:
|
|
EMPLOYERS NEED TO CONTROL THE RISK OF HAVS
|
HAVS - The Solution
- Include Hand-Arm Vibration in your
Health and Safety policy:
- Train operatives
- Monitor and limit exposure
- Select low vibration
equipment
- Check that the vibration levels
and useage times quoted by the manufacturer are accurate and represent
real life working conditions.
- Ensure the machine’s
productivity (output) is high. Inefficient equipment, even
with low vibration, can expose operators to harmful levels because they
have to use it for longer to finish the job.
- Choose tools that are easy and
comfortable for operators to use. Less effort equals less vibration.
|
Belle Group equipment is built for low vibration
|
|
Tested under realistic working conditions
|
|
Designed for maximum performance and output
|
|
Comfortable to use with excellent ergonomics
|
HAVS - The Proof
Comparative tests were carried out by AV
Technology (Stockport) Ltd April 2001.
The information gathered was to be used in a
publication "Plant Hire Executive" to demonstrate the difference in
the data supplied by manufacturers and the actual levels produced under
working conditions.
Tests were carried out on 100mm deep MOT
material (crushed aggregate with fines). Summarised below are the
average levels of the 6 passes for each compactor.
|
|
|
Average
ah,w
|
|
Time Limit
|
|
|
|
Belle PC 400
|
|
3.88m/sē
|
|
4h 10min
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Competitor A
|
|
8.97m/sē
|
|
47min
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Competitor B
|
|
12.15m/sē
|
|
25min
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Competitor C
|
|
9.24m/sē
|
|
44min
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Belle PC 400
(second set to establish repeatability)
|
|
3.69m/sē
|
|
4h 36min
|
|
|
The instrumentation used to perform
the measurements was a Svan 912AE Sound and Vibration Analyser, Svan 06A 4
channel module and Svan AP5021 Hand-Arm Adapter Set. Before leaving AVT's
offices the instrumentation was calibrated using a Bruel & Kjaer Type
4291 Calibrator which itself is traceably calibrated to UKAS (formally NAMAS)
Standards.
The analyser was set-up to measure
weighted acceleration magnitudes in all three axes simultaneously.The
tri-axial accelerometer was fitted to the handle of each compactor at the
position where the operator normally holds the hand by means of a jubilee
clip. The weighting curve used corresponds with the hand-arm vibration weighting
curve in BS 6842:1987. Handarm vibration was measured in 3 axes
simultaneously through several work cycles of approximately 22 seconds each
and the total weighted rms acceleration was determined from the vector sum of
the three weighted rms acceleration values ('ax,w' side
to side, 'ay,w' fore and aft, and 'az,w'
vertical).
Each compactor was tested running
over a 'MOT' type material. The ground was 'raked' by means of an adaptor
fitted on to the front of a skid steer loader after each machine to provide
an identical work surface for all compactors. A total of 6 passes were
undertaken on the same section of track on each compactor.
|
Belle Group plate compactors are designed to give
the lowest hand-arm vibration and the maximum
performance AS STANDARD
Dual Force is available on all PC Plates to
upgrade the compaction force - full compaction is achieved with fewer
passes so the operator is exposed to less vibration
|
|
Belle Group AFS Floor Saws have been developed to give
the lowest hand-arm vibration and the maximum
performance
The use of hand held saws for floor
sawing is an extremely high risk operation even for small patches. The AFS300 is the perfect alternative, the 350 gives a
deeper cut and higher output.
|
|
Belle Group UD Breakers have been developed to give
the lowest hand-arm vibration and the maximum
performance
Breakers are often used for extended
periods so operators are at high risk. The unique design of the UD breaker maximises operator
control and vibration reduction.
|
|
|